President Donald Trump and his administration this week seemed to belatedly come to the realization that their Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in Minneapolis are going poorly.

Trump appeared at a briefing Tuesday and bemoaned his team’s messaging. He and Vice President JD Vance began to acknowledge that ICE has been making or will make “mistakes.”

CNN reported Friday that it was all born of a fear that the issue was getting away from them — a fear that is certainly backed up by polling.

What Trump and his team notably did not do, though, was signal any real shift in the tactics that have landed them in their predicament.

And now the situation risks truly spiraling out of control — both on the ground and politically speaking.

The fatal shooting of another person — 37-year-old Alex Pretti — by a federal agent in Minneapolis in many ways conjures the episode two and a half weeks ago when an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good. It also comes amid a snowballing series of politically problematic moves that suggest things are only getting worse for the administration.

It remains to be seen how the country will react to Pretti’s killing. But what’s clear is that Americans are very much predisposed to believe ICE goes too far. And the details suggest we could be seeing a repeat of what followed in the aftermath of Good’s killing, when already-negative views of ICE hardened and expanded.

For one, the administration has again leapt to defend the federal agents involved and attack the person killed in ways that are premature and strain credulity, at best.

As with Good, the administration has painted Pretti as not just causing the agents to fear for their lives, but as deliberately targeting them for death.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wagered that Pretti had been trying “to inflict maximum damage.” Her department speculated that he was trying to “massacre law enforcement.” White House adviser Stephen Miller summarized the event as “an assassin tried to murder federal agents.”

Pretti was armed — he had a permit to carry the gun, per the Minneapolis police chief — and engaged in a scuffle after agents sprayed toward him with a chemical irritant. But no evidence has emerged to support the accusation that he was trying to kill them, and nothing in the videos we’ve seen so far shows him touching his weapon.

Indeed, the video seems to show an agent pulling a weapon from Pretti shortly before the man is shot, suggesting he might not have even had his gun when he was killed. And while DHS, the agency that includes Border Patrol and ICE, claimed Pretti approached the agents, the events appeared to be set off by an agent shoving a woman next to Pretti.

If Pretti had aimed to massacre the agents, he was sure waiting for a precarious situation to launch his plan.

And this prejudging of the situation is part of what made Good’s killing blow back on the administration. Polling showed Americans simply didn’t buy what the administration was saying. Only about one-quarter agreed with Noem that Good was engaging in “domestic terrorism.”

Another parallel lies in the administration’s actions after the killing. It clearly tried to avoid a full-scale investigation of the ICE agent who shot Good, and instead began trying to investigate Good herself — a posture that led prosecutors to resign. In Saturday’s incident, the Minneapolis police chief said federal officials tried to prevent local police from accessing the crime scene, and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension said DHS is not cooperating with the state agency. (CNN)