





























Loading banners
Loading banners...


NEWS EXPRESS is Nigeria’s leading online newspaper. Published by Africa’s international award-winning journalist, Mr. Isaac Umunna, NEWS EXPRESS is Nigeria’s first truly professional online daily newspaper. It is published from Lagos, Nigeria’s economic and media hub, and has a provision for occasional special print editions. Thanks to our vast network of sources and dedicated team of professional journalists and contributors spread across Nigeria and overseas, NEWS EXPRESS has become synonymous with newsbreaks and exclusive stories from around the world.

APC CHAIRMAN, DR UMAR GANDUJE
By RAMATU GARBA
A Kano State High Court, on Monday, adjourned until May 16 for ruling in an application filed by the State Government, seeking substituted service of case against the National Chairman of All Progressive Congress(APC), Dr Abdullahi Ganduje and seven others.
Ganduje, alongside his wife, Hafsat Umar, Abubakar Bawuro, Umar Abdullahi Umar, Jibrilla Muhammad, Lamash properties Limited,Safari Textiles Limited and Lasage General Enterprises Limited, are to be charged with eight counts bordering on bribery allegations, misappropriation and diversion of public funds running into billions of Naira against the defendants.
At the resumed hearing on Monday, Justice Usman Na’abba, adjourned the matter until May 16 for ruling in an application on the mode of service on the respondents and hearing of pending applications.
Earlier, the Prosecution Counsel, Mr Adeola Adedipe, SAN, argued that service of a criminal charge could be effected by substituted means.
“My lord Section 378 (5) ACJL 2019 Kano State provides that an application for leave may be brought before the Court on the effect of substituted service.
“Service on the defendant may be through his surety and legal practitioner among others” Adedipe said.
He urged the court to dismiss the respondents’ application, adding that their argument was pre-emptive and premature.
Counsel to the 6threspondent, MrNureini Jimoh, SAN, told the court that in a criminal trial, suspects were taken by law enforcement agencies.
He argued that the process of inviting the respondents to court had not been followed.
“There is no way the respondents have been invited.
“There is no charge in this case; what I have is application to prepare a charge,the court cannot rely on section 378 in bringing the respondents to court.
“I represent Lamash Properties limited, I am not a natural person where I can be served through substituted means,” Jimoh said.
He objected to the motion exparte by the prosecution seeking to serve the respondents through substituted means.
NAN reports that Ganduje, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7thand 8threspondents, were absent in court and were not represented. (NAN)