A Briton, Mike Arnold, has alleged that Britain is opposed to the actualisation of Biafra because of the over $6 trillion reparations she would be made to pay as required by law.

The Briton said if Biafra is actualised, the reparations Britain is supposed to pay is not a number pulled from the air, but a calculation built category by category from documented facts.

Arnold broke down the reparations Britain is supposed to pay to Biafra should it become a country to include oil revenue, wrongful death, structural damages among others.

“Nigeria has earned approximately $600b in oil revenue since the 1960s from Biafran territory. Two thirds of Shell-BP’s operations were in Biafran territory. At 60 percent territorial share was $360 billion. Adjusted for inflation from 1967 dollars to today, conservatively $2.5 trillion.

“Wrongful Death: Up to 3 million people we’re killed in Biafra which amounts to holocaust reparations, ICC awards, comparable genocide settlements — range from $100,000 to $500,000 per life. At a conservative $500,000 per person amounts to $1.5 trillion.

“Structural Damages — 112 years of the contraption. The 1914 amalgamation. The installation of the Caliphate as the administrative class. The 1960 handover was engineered to protect British commercial dominance. The ongoing genocide that architecture enables to this day. Caribbean nations are currently pursuing $10 trillion from Britain for slavery reparations. Biafra’s case is more recent, more direct, and more documentable. Conservative estimate is $1 trillion.” Arnold put reparations to be paid on obstruction of humanitarian aid, arms supply to an aggressor and others to $500b minimum. The approximate $6 trillion which Arnold said Britain is supposed to pay is the largest reparations claim in human history and twice Britain’s annual GDP. (The Sun, excluding headline)