





























Loading banners
Loading banners...


NEWS EXPRESS is Nigeria’s leading online newspaper. Published by Africa’s international award-winning journalist, Mr. Isaac Umunna, NEWS EXPRESS is Nigeria’s first truly professional online daily newspaper. It is published from Lagos, Nigeria’s economic and media hub, and has a provision for occasional special print editions. Thanks to our vast network of sources and dedicated team of professional journalists and contributors spread across Nigeria and overseas, NEWS EXPRESS has become synonymous with newsbreaks and exclusive stories from around the world.

Atiku rejects Yakubu’s ambassadorial nomination, calling it morally indefensible and damaging to electoral credibility and public trust.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar on Thursday faulted the nomination of the immediate-past chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commisson (INEC), Prof Mahmood Yakubu for appointment as an ambassador, saying it raises serious concerns.
According to him, under no circumstance would he as President of Nigeria nominate Yakubu as INEC chairman.
Atiku in a statement posted on his Facebook page and obtained by Arise News in Abuja, said apart from presenting “terrible optics” for an administration already struggling with credibility, it sends the wrong message to the current INEC leadership under Prof Joash Amupitan (SAN), that partisan, compromised or poorly executed elections may ultimately be rewarded.
He said, “Let me state without ambiguity: under no circumstance would I, as President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, nominate the immediate past INEC Chairman for an ambassadorial position. Such a nomination raises serious concerns.
“It risks appearing as a quid pro quo rather than a recognition of merit. It presents terrible optics for an administration already struggling with credibility.
“It sends the wrong message to the current INEC leadership; that partisan, compromised, or poorly executed elections may ultimately be rewarded. And most importantly, it is morally indefensible for an umpire at the centre of one of the most disputed elections in our history to become a beneficiary of its outcome.
“This is not the path to strengthening our democracy or restoring public trust in our institutions.” (Arise news)