By Fr. OKHUELEIGBE OSEMHANTIE Ã

Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria (CSN) has raised alarm over the counterfeiting and unauthorized sale of the Catholic Women Organization (CWO) uniform. This development has sent ripples across Catholic communities in Nigeria, igniting serious concerns over identity, integrity, and economic implications.

Catholic Women Organization of Nigeria uniform is not merely a piece of fabric; it is a symbol of identity, unity, and solidarity among Catholic women. It stands as a proof of their shared faith, communal strength, and an unbroken tradition that has influenced other Christian denominations to adopt similar attire for their women's organizations. Unlike fashion-driven clothing where affluence dictates the quality of fabric, the CWO uniform is designed to be a leveler. Even the wealthiest women adhere strictly to the standard fabric and texture, emphasizing equality within the organization.

The emergence of counterfeit CWO uniforms has raised fundamental questions about authenticity, economic justice, and the ethics of accessibility. The concern is not just about identity and organizational integrity but also about the financial implications for those who purchase the counterfeit material, sometimes at a price comparable to the original. While some argue that counterfeiting makes the uniform more accessible to lower-income women, others contend that it disrupts established economic structures, creating a shadow market that undermines quality and uniformity.

A major consideration in this matter is the principle of economies of scale, which dictates that mass production should reduce costs. However, this principle appears not to be at play in the pricing of the original CWO fabric, leaving many to wonder whether the market is artificially controlled. Some have argued that the high cost of the uniform has necessitated the rise of counterfeits, with those involved justifying their actions as a way of making the uniform more affordable for economically disadvantaged members, perhaps.

The reactions to this development have been mixed. In one instance, a vigilant Catholic faithful identified an alleged distributor of counterfeit uniforms and demanded his arrest. Elsewhere, voices advocating for economic inclusivity argue that the rigid pricing of the original fabric ignores the economic realities of poor members. Some have raised questions on whether the CWO uniform enjoys patent protection or intellectual property rights, and if so, whether legal action should be taken against those who manufacture and distribute unauthorized versions.

To address these concerns, several measures are being suggested. The CWO leadership may need to collaborate with relevant authorities to investigate and prosecute counterfeiters if legal protections exist. At the same time, quality control measures such as introducing special insignia, barcodes, or official emblems could help differentiate authentic uniforms from counterfeits. Additionally, there is a growing call for a review of the uniform’s pricing structure to accommodate different economic classes without compromising the uniformity that the attire represents. If subsidized programmes or installment-based payment options were introduced, fewer people would feel the need to resort to counterfeit versions.

The counterfeiting of the CWO uniform is more than an economic crime; it is a challenge to Catholic tradition, communal values, and the sanctity of a shared identity. While economic accessibility remains a legitimate concern, the integrity of the organization must not be compromised. A balanced approach—ensuring both affordability and authenticity—will be key to resolving this matter without eroding the foundational principles of the Catholic Women Organization.

•Fr. Okhueleigbe Osemhantie à writes from Port Harcourt, Nigeria.