As a concerned and observant citizen and someone conversant with the military, which I have served meritoriously for over 35 years before voluntarily retiring in 2019, I feel compelled to respond to the editorial published by The PUNCH on June 17, 2025, titled ?Benue Carnage: Beyond Army Chief?s Relocation.? That editorial, in my considered opinion, was not only riddled with factual inaccuracies but also laced with subtle mischief and a thinly veiled attempt to impugn the competence and integrity of the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) of the Nigerian Army, Lieutenant General OO Oluyede, mni.

Let me state without equivocation: The PUNCH based its entire editorial on falsehood. I have searched exhaustively and cannot recall nor find any record of the Chief of Army Staff or any organ of the Nigerian Army announcing a relocation to Makurdi, as was alleged. That claim is entirely fabricated. Yet, on this phantom announcement, the editorial weaves an entire narrative accusing the COAS of ineffectiveness, as if the failure of a non-existent relocation were a legitimate measure of leadership. This is not just misleading; it is reckless.

With my knowledge of him, Lieutenant General Oluyede is not a man given to media stunts or superficial gestures. Since time immemorial, his approach to military leadership has been defined by professionalism, quiet diligence and a deep understanding of Nigeria?s complex security terrain. As someone who follows security developments closely, I can attest that he knows exactly where his men are, what they are doing, and what they are capable of, particularly in the North-Central region. Military formations and units such as Operation WHIRL PUNCH, Operation WHIRL STROKE and the 401 Special Forces Brigade are not just in place; in active collaboration with other security agencies and stakeholders, they are operationally effective, delivering results under extraordinarily challenging conditions.

The suggestion that ?little has changed? in Benue because the COAS allegedly relocated is not only baseless; it is a cynical distortion of the facts. If The PUNCH had made the slightest effort to verify its claims, it would have discovered that no such relocation took place because it was never needed. However, he does visit the military locations periodically. Any keen observer will discern that the Nigerian Army, especially under his able leadership, does not rely on media optics to secure lives; it relies on strategy, structure, and trained men and women doing their jobs, often at great personal cost. It is worth pointing out that The Punch has become increasingly fond of such ill-informed publications, which often makes one question the motive behind them. Rather than enlighten the public or contribute meaningfully to national security discourse, such editorials seem designed to generate controversy and discredit public institutions, especially the military, without justification.

Since his appointment in an acting capacity on 30th September 2024, and subsequent screening and confirmation as the substantive Chief of Army Staff, by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR, Lieutenant General Oluyede has demonstrated exceptional leadership and operational command acumen. He has also demonstrated an undeniable capacity to work diligently. The Nigerian Army under his stewardship has recorded tremendous achievements in its assigned tasks across various theatres of operation. He has remained focused, strategic, and proactive in his duties, never distracted by media posturing or political noise.

Therefore, it is deeply disappointing that a newspaper of The Punch?s standing would publish an editorial based entirely on fiction. It betrays a lack of journalistic rigour and a worrying eagerness to sensationalise a national tragedy for editorial impact. What purpose is served by disseminating such misinformation? Certainly not accountability, and certainly not in public interest or enlightenment. If The PUNCH was genuinely concerned about the security situation in Benue, it could have taken the responsible route: reached out to military authorities, credible sources, reviewed the actual deployments, and reported verified events. Instead, it chose to peddle speculation and cloak it in editorial righteousness.

The Chief of Army Staff has demonstrated time and again that he is a focused, capable, and composed leader who does not need to shout from the rooftops to be effective. He works silently, relentlessly, and responsibly. He is not a showman; he is a well-experienced and well-trained soldier, who is result-oriented and has the welfare and well-being of his men at heart. Consequently, I urge The PUNCH to be more measured in its editorial judgements and to avoid descending into narratives that are not only misleading but damaging to national morale and the integrity of our institutions. If doubt exists, they should ask, not assume. That is what responsible journalism demands.

Nigeria stands at a critical crossroads. It is not a time for careless conjecture or the luxury of false narratives. The PUNCH should also understand that this is not the time to tear down those working hard to hold the line, especially not based on imagination. It is a time to support and strengthen those working earnestly to defend our country. Anything less does more harm than good.

? Brigadier General SK Usman (rtd), mni, fnipr, is a security and strategic communication expert. He can be reached via his social media handles @skusman.

Update news