The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas ?to urgently assess the human rights impacts of Nigeria?s reform bills currently being discussed by the National Assembly including on Nigerians living in poverty.?

SERAP said: ?any discussion and consideration of the tax reform bills must ensure full compliance with provisions of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and the country?s international human rights obligations and commitments.?

In the letter dated 7 December 2024 and signed by SERAP deputy director Kolawole Oluwadare, the organisation said: ?The assessments should be transparent, include public participation, and shape the provisions and measures that are ultimately passed. The outcome of any such assessments should be widely published.?

SERAP urged Akpabio and Abbas ?to pass a resolution directing Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice to hold Nigeria?s state governors to account on their spending of trillions of naira of revenue derived from taxes including VATs collected by their states since 2015 and to ensure the recovery of any proceeds of corruption.?

The letter reads in part: ?SERAP urges you to ensure the inclusion in the tax reform bills of transparency and accountability mechanisms to ensure that any revenue derived from taxes covered under the bills are not mismanaged, diverted or pocketed by politicians, their family members and close associates.

?SERAP notes that Nigerian authorities have the discretion to develop laws on taxation most appropriate to their circumstances.

?However, the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and human rights and anticorruption treaties to which the country is a state party impose limits on the discretion of the authorities in the development of any such laws.

?Our preliminary review of the provisions of the tax reform bills shows that the bills contain some provisions that are antithetical to human rights and the rule of law.

?For example, section 28(2)? of the Tax Administration bill among others, requires financial institutions including banks to provide to tax authorities ?the names, addresses, or any other information of new or existing customers.?

?Under section 28(4), financial institutions must make ?additional disclosure? about their customers ?if it is required by a notice signed by the Chief Executive Officer of the relevant tax authority.?

?These provisions, especially the phrases ?any other information? and ?additional disclosure?, if implemented, could be used unjustifiably or arbitrarily to restrict the right to privacy of customers.

?The risks of violations of human rights are illustrated by the absence in the bills of sufficient safeguards against abuse of access to personal data of customers.

?The provisions also give little or no consideration to data protection, thereby increasing the risks of misuse by public authorities of a customer?s personal details including their home address.

?Another troubling provision of the tax reform bills is section 57 of the Tax Administration bill which grants broad, extensive and intrusive powers to tax authorities which may be misused to undermine Nigerians? human rights.

?In particular, section 57(1) provides that ?an authorised officer of the relevant tax authority shall have free access to all land, buildings, places, books and documents, in the custody or under the control of a person, public officer, or institution, for the purpose of inspecting the books or documents.?

?Such official will also have free access to ?any property, process or matter which the officer considers necessary or relevant for the purpose of collecting any tax.?

?Under subsection 2, ?the relevant tax authority shall take immediate possession of [any] removable media and the related removable equipment or computer used to access the stored documents on the media in order to prevent the accidental or intentional destruction, removal or alteration of records and documents.?

?Section 57(5) seems to pre-empt the nature of any judicial authorisation required for tax official ?enter any private dwelling? by prescribing that such authorisation will ?be valid for a period of three months from the date of its issue or such lesser period as the judicial officer considers appropriate.?

?Under subsection 6, the tax official is required to ?produce the written authorisation and evidence of identity ?on first entering the private dwelling?. The official will only produce such evidence subsequently if they consider it reasonable to do so.

?These provisions are broadly worded and could be misused to violate Nigerians? human rights.

?The provisions also do not contain any special safeguards which means that the broad, extensive and intrusive powers granted to tax authorities could be arbitrarily exercised without any accountability.

?Section 57 also does not contain any explicit provisions that would allow the court to examine the lawfulness or necessity of any authorisation before or after any entering.?

?The provisions of section 81 of the Tax Administration bill essentially oust the jurisdiction of the court in pending tax matters by stating that ?the pendency of a legal proceeding shall not affect the performance of the duties or obligations of any taxable person under this Act or any other tax law.?

?The provisions could be misused to infringe the rights to equality and the right of access to courts, denying the right of an effective remedy to any aggrieved party.

?Several other provisions of the tax bills lack mechanisms for effective oversight and accountability, as required by the rule of law in a democratic society, thereby increasing the risks of abuse of power or arbitrariness. The provisions could be misused to violate Nigerians? right to property and fair hearing.

?The tax bills also do not seem to contain provisions for a fair balance between the authorities? powers to collect taxes and the requirements of the protection of the individual?s fundamental rights.

?The absence of provisions in the tax bills on meaningful judicial oversight and review and accountability procedures would also undermine the rights of Nigerians including to privacy and disproportionately affect disadvantaged and marginalized individuals and groups.

?Under human rights law, states including Nigeria are required to make the promotion and protection of human rights central to their tax systems. Nigeria needs a rights-based tax system that works for the people and not the politicians, their family members and close associates.

?The country also needs transparent, democratic and rights-aligned tax reforms to unlock the maximum available resources for the full realisation of human rights.

?Furthermore, there are credible reports that several state governors continue to divert or mismanage the revenue derived from taxes, impeding the funding of public goods and services that are crucial for the progressive realisation of human rights.

?In many states, millions of Nigerians continue to be denied access to essential public services such as water and basic sanitation while millions of children of school age roam the streets.

?SERAP is concerned that growing reports of corruption in the use of tax revenue and other public resources continue to disproportionately affect poor Nigerians and other most vulnerable segments of the population.

?SERAP is concerned that the opposition by some state governors against the tax reform bills may be politically motivated and reduce the tax payable to the national treasury. State governors should constructively engage in good faith in the processes to adopt a national tax system for the country.

?We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken in the consideration of the tax reform bills.

?If the offending provisions of the tax reform bills including those outlined above are not addressed and brought in conformity with human rights standards and safeguards, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and other members of the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest.

?SERAP notes that the tax reform bills, if properly aligned with human rights standards, would enhance the ability of the Federal Government, states and local governments to fulfil their human rights obligations and adequately fund public services essential for human rights.

?However, without transparency and accountability, revenue derived from taxes may not be spent to combat poverty and fund development as well as provide essential public goods and services for Nigerians.

?The National Assembly has the constitutional responsibility to conduct and publish human rights impact assessments of the tax reform bills to ensure that proposed reforms best protect, advance and fulfill people?s human rights.

?SERAP also urges you to revise and repeal several of the provisions of the bills, particularly the Tax Administration bill.

?SERAP urges you to include provisions in the tax reform bills that will ensure that Nigerians have access to all relevant data and information on fiscal policy and government revenues, including from the corporate sector.

?According to our information, members of the National Assembly are currently discussing Nigeria?s tax bills which primarily aim to ?provide uniform procedures for a consistent and efficient administration of tax laws in order to- (a) facilitate tax compliance by taxpayers; and (b) optimise tax revenue.??

Update news