NIA’s ‘black budget’ and mysterious whistle-blower, By Yushau Shuaib

Posted by News Express | 9 May 2017 | 1,815 times

Gmail icon

•Yushau Shuaib.

Preparatory to the daring and merciless military operations against Boko Haram members, top officers of security and intelligence agencies were in Lagos and Abuja, towards the end of 2014, to interact with critical stakeholders that matter in shaping public perception and opinions. The then President of Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE), Mr. Femi Adesina, was part of the audience.

The interactive sessions involved the display of video-clips of horrific atrocities of Boko Haram terrorists against humanity. Gory scenes of brutal executions of captured intelligence officers, who were accused of spying on the terrorists’ group were shown. The officers and their informants were cruelly dismembered, buried or burnt alive by the dare devil terrorists.

One of the heart-aching videos was that of a captured female intelligence operative who was daggered into pieces before she could plead for her life. Few months after some debriefing with the stakeholders, through miraculous strategies of operations against terrorists, positive images emerged on the gallantry of Nigerian troops. PRNigeria released some of the de-classified videos on the storming of Sambisa forest by the Special Forces and Intelligence operatives from the air and on the ground. The original video showed hijab-dressed female Intelligence operatives, guiding women and children from the air raid to safe military zone.

There were also reported cases of captured men dressed in women attire, by Nigerian troops who were later discovered to be security operatives assigned to spy in terrorists’ enclaves. Strangely enough, between January to May 2015, when Sambo Dasuki was the then National Security Adviser, over two dozen occupied towns were successfully recovered and liberated from Boko Haram. These were: Abadam, Askira, Baga, Bama, Bara, Buni Yadi, Damboa, Dikwa, Gamboru-Ngala, Goniri, Gujba, Gulag, Gulani, Gwoza, Hong, Kala Balge, Konduga, Kukawa, Marte, Madagali, Michika, Monguno, Mubi, Vimtim, among other communities.

Meanwhile, while the military and security agencies took credit for all counter-terrorism campaigns, most of the high-profile terrorists arrested, especially at the borders and across the borders, were facilitated by the Intelligence service. The service also facilitated the participations of reluctant neighbours in Multi-National Joint Taskforce (MNJTF) and other special, for the success of operations. 

Recently, too, when 21 Chibok girls were freed by Boko Haram in October 2016, Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo publicly disclosed that there was no exchange of detained members of the Boko Haram sect for the girls. The Information Minister, Lai Mohammed, also strongly denied the report that Nigerian government paid a robust ransom for their release. Since no one knows what influenced the 'Father Christmas’ gesture of Boko Haram leaders in releasing the girls, which even took a section of the military by surprise, it is purely exceptional Intelligence operation.

Yours truly has deliberately avoided mentioning any of Nigeria’s secret organisations on the above operations. The recent exposure of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) to disrepute, after the discovery of cash-haul in an Ikoyi, Lagos apartment, is a sad commentary on one of the most organised, fine and respected intelligence organisations in Africa. Not only has the scandal damaged the integrity of the agency, it further exposed Nigeria’s intelligence community to global ridicule.

It is necessary to point out that in security circles, a ‘black budget’ is allocated for classified and other covert operations of a nation, which can be expended under different covers and through different channels, including funding of NGOs, cultural groups, religious organisations, corporations, private firms in most cases through cash which its source could not be traced. Consciously and unconsciously, patriotic and innocent citizens have supported or carried out intelligence activities, without being identified with the secret service.

The instrument relating to the establishment, structure and duties of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), especially under the National Security Agencies Act 1986 (Cap 278LFN), clearly states: “The accounts of the National Intelligence Agency shall not be subject to external audit, but the Director-General shall, by first week of March each year, render to the President… certificate showing the total expended during the preceding period and  the under which the expenditure was made and copy the National Security Adviser.” 

Similarly, there are repeated keywords on NIA’s mandates. These include: National security, national interest, employing covert sources, using the cover of government or private concerns; conduct espionage, covert operations, and counter-intelligence activities.

Even though there are declared staff, who are authorised to disclose their identities, most intelligence operatives are undeclared and barred from disclosing their identities, except only to close family members and associates. While some live in opulence for covert assignments, others act beggarly and pretend to be poor in sensitive terrains.

The intelligence agencies allow other sister agencies take the credit for successful operations. Most of the arrested terrorists’ commanders, especially at the borders and across the borders, were facilitated by the intelligence service.

The scandal over N15 billion recovered by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) at Osborne Towers, Ikoyi, Lagos is quite embarrassing because the Director-General of NIA, Ambassador Ayo Oke, has claimed that the money belonged to the agency.

The incident is coming at a period of an intense inter-agency rivalry, where security agencies were allegedly reported to be behind the leakages of classified and confidential information to smear their perceived opponents within the same government.

The above scenario is again playing out here. Now that NIA has laid claim to the amount found in the Ikoyi apartment, does it mean the Economic and Financial Crimes was misled?  Is the mysterious whistle-blower a character in the inter-agency rivalry? Or, is it a counter-intelligence by another foreign secret service against Nigeria?

In a December 2016’s article by this writer on Magu’s EFCC, entitled Between Suspects and Victims (, I warned: “President Buhari should ensure that the brewing inter-agency conflict among critical institutions should be urgently addressed. For instance, if the EFCC should attempt to retaliate against the report of DSS, the result will not only be dirty but likely to compromise national security.”

While the EFCC publicised the discovery, it has totally failed to disclose the owner. Even the vibrant spokesperson of EFCC, Wilson Uwujaren, had to put off his mobile phone for almost 72 hours during the fracas.

With fingers pointing to the fact that the money belongs to NIA, the burden of proof is: Who is the mysterious whistle-blower? Could the whistle-blower have acted on behalf of an agency engaged in the rivalry or was it as a major counter-intelligence operation by foreign interests, to expose and embarrass our intelligence network?

There are many ways of removing public officers, but such attempts should not be done by rubbishing the integrity of public institutions they represent, especially in Nigeria's security architecture.

I strongly believe at this critical period - and with the unabated inter-agency rivalries and the incidence of leakages of classified information by some agencies of government - the current National Security Adviser, Gen Babagana Monguno, should be wary of these developments. Though a gentleman, he needs to be more pragmatic, charismatic, assertive and decisive in dealing with erring agencies.

•Yushau Shuaib, Publisher of PRNigeria, is a global award-winner in crisis communication, and can be reached at

Source: News Express

Readers Comments

0 comment(s)

No comments yet. Be the first to post comment.

You may also like...