Amnesty Report: Nigerian Army lied about massacre of Biafra activists —Intersociety
Posted by News Express | 26 November 2016 | 6,151 times
A rights group, the International Society for Civil Liberties and Rule of Law (Intersociety) has lampooned the Nigerian Army for attempting to deny culpability and misrepresent the facts of Amnesty International on mass killing of Pro-Biafra activists. The group described Army’s reaction as provocative, false and unprofessional.
In a statement released on Saturday morning in Onitsha by Intersociety, signed by Emeka Umeagbalasi, Board Chairman; Obianuju Igboeli, Head, Civil Liberties & Rule of Law Programme; and Chinwe Umeche, Head, Democracy & Good Governance Programme, the group pointed out that in the late evening of November 23rd, 2016, the long awaited Special Report of Amnesty International, the world’s largest and most respected rights body, was released from its London Headquarters, “and almost immediately after the release of the Report; the Nigerian Army hurriedly and shamelessly released a statement of denial and falsehood.”
The group commended the authorities of Amnesty International-UK for their courage, in-depth investigation and analysis.
Intersociety said the Army statement also falls far below or acutely short of the doctrines of modern soldiering or military science; the international best practices in civilian affairs handling styles as well as the Principles and Purposes of the United Nations particularly protection and promotion of human rights and international peace and security.
It stated that the contents of the Army statement further depicts unprofessionalism and grossly runs contrary to the fundamental rules of the international law particularly the ‘Ten Basic Standards of the International Law and Humanitarian Principles’; containing strict guidelines for state actors in managing nonviolent (and even riotous) assemblies; other than active armed rebellion against an independent political territory recognised under the UN System.
The group also declared that having studied the Army statement, “the Nigerian Army of present composition is Jihadist and ethnically biased in its operations and exercise of its auxiliary securitisation roles particularly as it concerns its genocidal response to the peaceful and nonviolent processions and protests by members of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and other Pro-Biafra campaigners as well as those of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN).
“That the Nigerian Army is a military assemble dominated by promoters and perpetrators of ethnocide, religocide and genocide.
“That the Nigerian Army’s operational modes are utterly vindictive, Yorean, hegemonic, crude, barbaric, murderous and atrocious.
“That the Nigerian Army grossly and recklessly adopts and uses via Presidential backing; operational death code of treat (including waste or kill) any Pro-Biafra campaigner as a terrorist, failed coupist or insurrectionist with associated torturous and murderous sanctions outside the law.
“That the Nigerian Army is engrossed in falsehood and criminal spinning of alarming proportions.
“That the Nigerian Army brazenly and wickedly corrupts and bastardises the UN Principles of Rules of Engagement; which are fundamentally embedded in the Geneva Conventions or Laws of War of 1949; which, in turn, originated from the three war (bellum) principles of Jus Ad Bellum, Jus In Bellum and Jus Post Bellum.
“That the Nigerian Army’s constant reference to use of ‘Rules of Engagement’ in massacring unarmed and defenceless members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN) and unarmed and defenceless citizens exercising their regional and international rights to self determination such as members of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) is a total corruption and bastardisation of the UN System’s Rules of Engagement; strictly designed for internal and international armed conflicts as well as a fundamental breach of the Fundamental Rules of the International Law under the UN System.”
Intersociety also stressed that under the UN System, no armed forces of any member-state of the UN including the Nigerian Army are allowed to use war-like weaponry and force to control or manage citizens’ street match grievances; and where force is allowed at all, principles of Use of Force and its Proportionality must be strictly applied at all times. That is, firearms or automatic weapons must not be used to disarm protesting citizens holding catapults.
It also said that till date, there are no traces of members of the IPOB taking up arms against the Federal Republic of Nigeria or any part thereof; and that no concrete evidence has been produced by the Federal Government empirically showing that members of IPOB have engaged in bombing of any government or public facility or killing of soldiers and other members of the security forces in battle fields; no battle fields whether active or passive have been identified and linked to members of the IPOB; no member of IPOB dead or alive has been linked by any branch of the Nigerian security forces; with provable evidence; to culpable homicide or murder of any innocent Nigerian citizen.
Intersociety said that almost all the street protests embarked upon by members of IPOB since July/August 2015 have been devoid of violence; particularly at the beginning of the protests and where any violent rarely erupted; it most likely occurred on account of rare expression of angers and frustrations by the surviving peaceful protesters over the unprovoked shooting and killing of their unarmed and defenceless colleagues by soldiers and other members of the security forces.
“That the host State Governments in the protesting areas, in conjunction with killer-security agents have on several occasions, attempted to plant violence into the peaceful protests so as to find grounds to unleash deadly State violence on the Pro Biafra peaceful protesters; and in some cases; some police personnel were found to have been used as sacrificial lambs by their operational commanders during the peaceful protests by being collaterally shot so as to portray IPOB as a violent or militant group.
“That where such unfortunate police officers rarely met the wrath of provoked and retreating peaceful protesters by way of clubbing or fist cuff wounds, they most likely got shot under in-service circumstances so as to blame it on IPOB and its leadership and portray same as ‘Armed Independent People of Biafra’ (Retired IGP Solomon Arase, June 2016).
“That the use of Biafra Flags, Chaplets and Holy Bibles during IPOB street protests or Church Vigils or School Compound Singing and Praying can never be translated or interpreted to mean ‘use of firearms’, ‘dynamites’ or ‘raw acids.’
“That conversely, there were provable evidence that it was soldiers that used raw acids and machetes against the unarmed and defenceless Pro Biafra Campaigners particularly during the 9thof February 2016 IPOB singing and prayer procession inside the National High School in Aba as well as the 29th and 30th of May 2016 World Igbo/Biafra Heroes Day at Nkpor and its environs.
“That further attestation to the fact that Pro-Biafra campaigners particularly members of IPOB have remained nonviolent and a non-armed opposition group could be seen in the nine-count criminal charges preferred by the Federal Government against Citizen Nnamdi Kanu and three others before a Federal High Court in Abuja.
“That in the whole charges none of them is charged with evidence generated murder or manslaughter, or rape, or armed uprising or active terrorism; and that in the case of Engineer Chidiebere Onwudiwe who was charged with ‘terrorism’; the accusation to the effect that he was “caught in Enugu researching on how to make Improvise Explosive Devices (IEDs)”, will legally take the second coming of Jesus Christ for it to convictably proved.
“That in the case of Mr. Benjamin Madubugwu, who was charged with ‘unlawful possession of firearms (Pump Action Gun)’; the ‘Pump Action Gun(s)’ is categorized under the Firearms Act of 2004 as ‘non prohibited firearms’ (i.e. it can be possessed by any citizen with a valid licence).
“That the Nigerian Army and other culpable security agencies in the butchery of at least 250 Pro Biafra Campaigners have no iota of defence or justification for heinously perpetrating the mass-murder with reckless abandon in about eight different locations between July/August 2015 and May 2016.
“That their attempts to ‘manufacture or plant group violence’ to escape their deadly culpabilities have failed woefully; locally, regionally and internationally.
“That these explain desperation of the Buhari administration and its killer-security forces, leading to seemed unleashing of both physical and psychological threats on the authorities of the Amnesty International in Nigeria so as to scare them from releasing the Special Report in Nigeria; forcing them to change its release venue from Nigeria to UK, as was the case three days ago,” Intersociety said.